Diabetic Retinopathy: Assessing the Armamentarium for Improved Detection and Treatment


You passed! Review the answers below.

Please try again. The questions you answered incorrectly are highlighted in red below.

Question 1
Which of the following statements is incorrect regarding OCT angiography (OCTA) for evaluation of diabetic eyes?
Please complete this question.
Please try again.

The correct answer is C.

Rationale: OCT angiography (OCTA) detects typical diabetic changes before they are visible clinically. OCTA is an emerging modality for vascular structure assessment and nonperfusion evaluation that;

  • Reconstructs vascular flow patterns
  • Combines structural and functional feedback
  • Provides novel information compared to both conventional OCT and fluorescein angiography
  • But does not provide leakage information
Question 2
In Protocol S, 5-year outcomes of panretinal photocoagulation (PRP) versus intravitreal ranibizumab for proliferative diabetic retinopathy showed which of the following?
Please complete this question.
Please try again.

The correct answer is A.

Rationale: In Protocol S, visual acuity in most study eyes that completed follow-up was very good at 5 years and was similar in both groups. Severe vision loss or serious PDR complications were uncommon with PRP or ranibizumab. However, the ranibizumab group had lower rates of developing vision-impairing diabetic macular edema and less visual field loss. Patient-specific factors, including anticipated visit compliance, cost, and frequency of visits, should be considered when choosing treatment for patients with PDR. These findings support either anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy or PRP as viable treatments for patients with PDR.

Reference: Gross JG, et al. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2018;136(10):1138-48.

Question 3
A 47-year-old white man presents for his annual examination. He is monocular due to a previous right eye injury. He has no complaints but wants new glasses, despite having 20/20 VA. The patient has type 2 diabetes mellitus for 10 years, with good glycemic control. Examination reveals some dot-blot hemorrhages on fundus photography, with normal OCT, consistent with mild proliferative DR. No treatment is rendered. He returns in 6 months and more hemorrhages and DME are observed on fundus photography. What is the best treatment approach to initiate at this time?
Please complete this question.
Please try again.

The correct answer is B.

Rationale: Despite the significant reduction in DR in patients with good glycemic control, DR develops even in that setting and is independently associated with disease duration. Anti-VEGF therapy would be the most prudent approach in this patient with proliferative retinopathy.